Main Article Content
In 2020, most of the Australian workforce engaged in remote work. Border conflicts (work interfering with family conflict and family interfering with work conflict) are negatively associated with well-being and productivity in traditional work settings. The current study aimed to explore the relationship between border conflict, wellbeing, and productivity when working remotely. Method. Participants were 340 adults aged 18 - 62 years (Mean = 33.98, SD = 8.80). To be eligible, individuals needed to be over the age of 18, living in Australia and working from home for at least one hour per week. Respondents reported on their levels of border conflict (Work-Family Conflict scale), wellbeing (Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale), productivity (Individual Work Performance Questionnaire) and demographic variables. Hierarchical linear regression analysis assessed associations between border conflict, productivity, and wellbeing. Results. Work interfering with family conflict and family interfering with work conflict demonstrated significant, negative associations with wellbeing Family interfering with work conflict demonstrated a significant, negative association with productivity, but work interfering with family conflict did not. Conclusion. Results demonstrate the importance of considering work and personal in unison when attempting to understanding employee’s productivity and wellbeing, especially when working remotely.
Amstad, F. T., Meier, L. L., Fasel, U., Elfering, A., & Semmer, N. K. (2011). A Meta-Analysis of Work-Family Conflict and Various Outcomes With a Special Emphasis on Cross-Domain Versus Matching-Domain Relations. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(2), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022170 Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2015). Characteristics of Employment, Australia, August 2015. https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mediareleasesbyCatalogue/630DCF813FED0E0CCA258113001878F2?OpenDocument Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2020). Labour Force, Australia, Apr 2020. https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/6202.0 Baron, S., Bond, M. A., Kalaja, A., Cazeca, D., Daniel, S., Markkanen, P., Health, N. I. for O. S. and, Punnett, L., Tsurikova, L., & Work, U. of M. at L. C. for W. &. (2007). Expanding Our Understanding of the Psychosocial Work Environment: A Compendium of Measures of Discrimination, Harassment and Work-family Issues. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. https://books.google.com.au/books?id=SIYOHv-2CZUC Batz-Barbarich, C., Tay, L., Kuykendall, L., and Cheung, H, K. (2018). A Meta-Analysis of Gender Differences in Subjective Well-Being: Estimating Effect Sizes and Associations With Gender Inequality. Psychological Science, 29, 10.1177/0956797618774796. Beno, M., & Hvorecky, J. (2021). Data on an Austrian Company’s Productivity in the Pre-Covid-19 Era, During the Lockdown and After Its Easing: To Work Remotely or Not? Frontiers in Communication, 6, 46. Bosua, R., Kurnia, S., Gloet, M., & Mendoza, A. (2017). Telework impact on productivity and well-being: An Australian study. In Social Inclusion and Usability of ICT-Enabled Services (pp. 187–207). Routledge.